Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: https://dspace.mnau.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/27267
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorКошкін, Дмитро Леонідович-
dc.contributor.authorKoshkin, Dmitriy-
dc.contributor.authorПанфілова, Антоніна Вікторівна-
dc.contributor.authorPanfilova, Antonina-
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-04T07:21:29Z-
dc.date.available2026-11-04T07:21:29Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.mnau.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/27267-
dc.description.abstractPurpose. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of reconstructing winter wheat normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) time series using Sentinel‑1 radar data and phenologically normalized time under incomplete Sentinel‑2 optical coverage, and to evaluate the robustness of the approach across growing seasons. Methods. The study used data from three experimental plots at the Educational, Scientific and Practical Center of Mykolaiv National Agrarian University over four growing seasons (2021–2025). Phenologically normalized time was used to establish a common temporal scale across seasons. Sentinel‑1 VV and VH backscatter coefficients, the polarization ratio Q, and the Radar Vegetation Index (RVI) were used as predictors. Sentinel‑1 and Sentinel‑2 observations were matched according to their closest phenological timing. Seasonal NDVI dynamics were reconstructed using a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) and evaluated under two scenarios: random withholding of individual observations and block-gap validation simulating a prolonged absence of optical observations caused by persistent cloud cover. Results. The relationship between NDVI and SAR predictors was strongly phase dependent. RVI and Q showed the highest correlations with NDVI during spring regrowth, whereas VV showed the weakest relationship. In both validation scenarios, the model reproduced the main seasonal NDVI trajectory, including autumn canopy development, winter decline, spring regrowth, and maximum values around heading. Reconstruction was more accurate under random withholding, while block-gap validation remained more challenging but preserved the seasonal NDVI dynamics across the continuous optical gap. Findings. Combining phenologically normalized time with Sentinel‑1 SAR predictors within a GAM provides a suitable basis for reconstructing winter wheat NDVI under incomplete Sentinel‑2 coverage. The results demonstrate the potential of Sentinel‑1 and Sentinel‑2 integration to improve the temporal continuity of NDVI time series for winter wheat monitoring. Further research should include additional growing seasons and agroclimatic regions and apply spatially independent validation.uk_UA
dc.description.abstract--
dc.description.abstractPurpose. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of reconstructing winter wheat normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) time series using Sentinel‑1 radar data and phenologically normalized time under incomplete Sentinel‑2 optical coverage, and to evaluate the robustness of the approach across growing seasons. Methods. The study used data from three experimental plots at the Educational, Scientific and Practical Center of Mykolaiv National Agrarian University over four growing seasons (2021–2025). Phenologically normalized time was used to establish a common temporal scale across seasons. Sentinel‑1 VV and VH backscatter coefficients, the polarization ratio Q, and the Radar Vegetation Index (RVI) were used as predictors. Sentinel‑1 and Sentinel‑2 observations were matched according to their closest phenological timing. Seasonal NDVI dynamics were reconstructed using a Generalized Additive Model (GAM) and evaluated under two scenarios: random withholding of individual observations and block-gap validation simulating a prolonged absence of optical observations caused by persistent cloud cover. Results. The relationship between NDVI and SAR predictors was strongly phase dependent. RVI and Q showed the highest correlations with NDVI during spring regrowth, whereas VV showed the weakest relationship. In both validation scenarios, the model reproduced the main seasonal NDVI trajectory, including autumn canopy development, winter decline, spring regrowth, and maximum values around heading. Reconstruction was more accurate under random withholding, while block-gap validation remained more challenging but preserved the seasonal NDVI dynamics across the continuous optical gap. Findings. Combining phenologically normalized time with Sentinel‑1 SAR predictors within a GAM provides a suitable basis for reconstructing winter wheat NDVI under incomplete Sentinel‑2 coverage. The results demonstrate the potential of Sentinel‑1 and Sentinel‑2 integration to improve the temporal continuity of NDVI time series for winter wheat monitoring. Further research should include additional growing seasons and agroclimatic regions and apply spatially independent validation.-
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.subjectwinter wheatuk_UA
dc.subjectSentinel-1uk_UA
dc.subjectSentinel-2uk_UA
dc.subjectNDVIuk_UA
dc.subjectSARuk_UA
dc.subjectphenologically normalized timeuk_UA
dc.subjectGAMuk_UA
dc.subjecttime series reconstructionuk_UA
dc.subjectпшениця озимаuk_UA
dc.subjectфенологічно нормалізований часuk_UA
dc.subjectреконструкція часових рядівuk_UA
dc.titleReconstructing winter wheat NDVI time series using Sentinel-1 radar datauk_UA
dc.title.alternativeВикористання радарних даних Sentinel-1 для реконструкції часового ряду NDVI пшениці озимоїuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Розташовується у зібраннях:Публікації у фахових виданнях України (Факультет агротехнологій)
Публікації у фахових виданнях України (Інженерно-енергетичний факультет)

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
1211-Текст статті-2332-1-10-20261021.pdf532,14 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/Відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.